Navigating the GRC Landscape: Insights for Marketing Agencies Seeking Compliance Tools When analyzing customer feedback across multiple platforms, it becomes clear that marketing agencies often overthink their Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) tool choices. Research shows that while many are drawn to flashy features, what truly matters is a tool's ability to streamline processes and ensure data integrity. For instance, brands like LogicGate and OneTrust frequently appear in top-rated lists for their user-friendly interfaces and robust reporting capabilities. Many reviews indicate that LogicGate's customizable workflows may help agencies adapt quickly to changing regulations, making compliance less of a headache. Interestingly, industry reports suggest that budget-friendly options like ZenGRC are gaining traction among smaller agencies; users appreciate its straightforward design and cost-effectiveness without sacrificing essential features. But do you really need the most expensive software to stay compliant?Navigating the GRC Landscape: Insights for Marketing Agencies Seeking Compliance Tools When analyzing customer feedback across multiple platforms, it becomes clear that marketing agencies often overthink their Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) tool choices.Navigating the GRC Landscape: Insights for Marketing Agencies Seeking Compliance Tools When analyzing customer feedback across multiple platforms, it becomes clear that marketing agencies often overthink their Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) tool choices. Research shows that while many are drawn to flashy features, what truly matters is a tool's ability to streamline processes and ensure data integrity. For instance, brands like LogicGate and OneTrust frequently appear in top-rated lists for their user-friendly interfaces and robust reporting capabilities. Many reviews indicate that LogicGate's customizable workflows may help agencies adapt quickly to changing regulations, making compliance less of a headache. Interestingly, industry reports suggest that budget-friendly options like ZenGRC are gaining traction among smaller agencies; users appreciate its straightforward design and cost-effectiveness without sacrificing essential features. But do you really need the most expensive software to stay compliant? Often reported to be more effective are tools that focus on core functionalities over an abundance of unnecessary bells and whistles. A humorous aside: choosing a GRC tool shouldn’t feel like picking a favorite child—it's about finding what works best for your unique needs! While some agencies may thrive on the complexity of comprehensive solutions, others might find that simplicity is key. Historical context reveals that companies like RSA have been at the forefront of compliance solutions for decades, adapting to market needs as they evolve. Market research indicates that agencies should also consider seasonal changes—tools that integrate seamlessly with marketing platforms during peak seasons may enhance efficiency significantly. Ultimately, it’s about aligning your agency’s workflow with the right GRC tool; after all, peace of mind in compliance doesn’t have to come at a premium.
Enablon's GRC solution is engineered specifically to provide comprehensive risk, compliance, and governance solutions for marketing agencies. The platform provides robust tools for risk assessment, regulatory compliance, and corporate governance, critical for marketing agencies dealing with sensitive consumer data and strict industry regulations.
Enablon's GRC solution is engineered specifically to provide comprehensive risk, compliance, and governance solutions for marketing agencies. The platform provides robust tools for risk assessment, regulatory compliance, and corporate governance, critical for marketing agencies dealing with sensitive consumer data and strict industry regulations.
AUTOMATED COMPLIANCE
USER-FRIENDLY INTERFACE
Best for teams that are
High-risk industries like oil, gas, and manufacturing
Large enterprises prioritizing EHS and operational risk
Global firms needing robust sustainability and ESG tools
Skip if
Office-based agencies with low physical or environmental risk
Small to mid-sized companies needing a lightweight tool
Teams with limited budget for enterprise-grade implementation
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Enablon uniquely bridges the gap between operational risk (EHS) and enterprise risk (GRC), a capability validated by its 'Leader' status in Verdantix Green Quadrants. Research indicates its 'Vision Platform' effectively breaks down silos, allowing real-time IoT data from the field to inform high-level ESG and risk strategies. Based on documented features, it is the go-to choice for complex, asset-intensive industries requiring deep regulatory adherence.
Pros
Unifies EHS, ESG, and GRC in one platform
Leader in Gartner and Verdantix analyst reports
Advanced BowTie risk visualization and barrier management
Used by 80% of top 10 pharma companies
Strong regulatory compliance (OSHA, ISO standards)
Cons
High cost (starts ~$50k/year)
Mobile app suffers from sync/login issues
Steep learning curve for new users
Implementation often requires external consultants
Opaque pricing structure
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.7/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.5
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC modules, including risk, audit, and policy management, and the depth of integration with operational workflows.
What We Found
Enablon offers a comprehensive 'Vision Platform' that unifies Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) with EHS and ESG, featuring advanced modules for internal control, audit management, and bow-tie risk visualization.
Score Rationale
The product scores exceptionally high due to its unique ability to bridge operational risk (EHS/ORM) with enterprise risk, a depth rarely found in standalone GRC tools.
Supporting Evidence
Modules include internal controls, internal audits, insurance & claims, and continuous assessment. Enablon GRC solutions encompass risk management... internal controls, internal audits, insurance & claims... and action plans.
— esecurityplanet.com
The platform supports advanced risk methodologies including BowTie diagrams for barrier management and real-time control. Visualize risk pathways with BowTie diagrams and live barrier dashboards.
— marketplace.microsoft.com
Enablon Vision Platform centralizes governance, risk, compliance, health and safety, environment, sustainability, and business continuity processes. Enablon Vision Platform is an integrated risk management platform that centralizes governance, risk, compliance... and business continuity processes.
— netzerocompare.com
Documented in official product documentation, Enablon GRC offers comprehensive risk assessment and compliance tools tailored for marketing agencies.
— wolterskluwer.com
9.8
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess analyst recognition, market share, and adoption by leading enterprises in regulated industries.
What We Found
Enablon is a dominant market leader, consistently named a 'Leader' in Gartner Magic Quadrants and Verdantix Green Quadrants, and is trusted by 80% of the top 10 pharmaceutical companies.
Score Rationale
The score reflects near-perfect market credibility, backed by Wolters Kluwer and consistent top-tier analyst rankings across EHS, PSM, and ESG sectors.
Supporting Evidence
Gartner positioned Enablon in the Leaders Quadrant for Environmental, Health and Safety Management Systems. Enablon... announced it has been positioned by Gartner, Inc. in the Leaders Quadrant...
— 3blmedia.com
The platform is used by 80% of the top ten pharmaceutical firms and 50% of the top ten chemical producers. The report recognizes that 80% of the top ten pharmaceuticals firms, 50% of the top ten chemicals producers... use Wolters Kluwer Enablon.
— wolterskluwer.com
Verdantix recognized Wolters Kluwer (Enablon) as a Leader in the Green Quadrant: EHS Software 2025 report. Wolters Kluwer... has been named as a Leader in the Verdantix Green Quadrant: EHS Software 2025 report.
— wolterskluwer.com
8.2
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze user interface design, mobile app performance, and ease of implementation based on user reviews.
What We Found
While support is rated highly, the mobile app (Enablon Go) suffers from significant negative reviews regarding connectivity, and the desktop UI is described as 'cumbersome' by some users.
Score Rationale
This category scores lower due to documented struggles with the mobile application's offline capabilities and the steep learning curve associated with the platform's complexity.
Supporting Evidence
Some users describe the software as 'cumbersome' and difficult to navigate without extensive training. It is the most cumbersome POS I've ever seen and absolutely terrible for our employees to use when reporting.
— reddit.com
The Enablon Go app has a low rating of 2.8 out of 5 on the Apple App Store due to login and sync issues. Ratings & Reviews. 2.8 out of 5. ... This app is not working and is stuck on the step 'downloading offline data'
— apps.apple.com
Users report the mobile app defaults to incorrect workflows and has issues with offline data downloading. I use this software all day... but unfortunately due to the mobile app defaulting to line manager... This needs fixing guys
— play.google.com
8.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We examine pricing models, transparency, and return on investment for the target enterprise demographic.
What We Found
Pricing is enterprise-grade and opaque, with reports indicating costs starting around $50,000/year and reaching six figures, which may be prohibitive for smaller firms.
Score Rationale
The score is impacted by the lack of public pricing and high entry cost, though this is balanced by the high ROI delivered to large, complex organizations.
Supporting Evidence
The vendor does not publicly communicate price information, requiring custom quotes. The provider does not communicate any price information. This is a common practice for software vendors...
— omr.com
Users note the high cost, describing it as a '6 figure annual costing system'. One of the aspects that has a huge impact is the cost. Globally for my company this software is a 6 figure annual costing system.
— g2.com
Pricing is subscription-based and starts at approximately $50,000 per year. Enablon Risk Management offers subscription-based pricing starting from $50,000/year for enterprise-level implementations.
— softwarefinder.com
We look for deep integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics into the core risk platform.
What We Found
Enablon is a market leader in ESG, offering 'ESG Excellence' that bridges EHS, sustainability, and finance, allowing for investor-grade reporting and disclosure.
Score Rationale
Enablon sets the standard for integrated ESG, scoring highly for its ability to treat non-financial ESG data with the same rigor as financial data.
Supporting Evidence
Verdantix recognized Enablon as a Leader in ESG Reporting and Data Management Software. Wolters Kluwer was also named as a Leader in the Green Quadrant: ESG Reporting and Data Management Software
— wolterskluwer.com
Enablon's ESG platform integrates with EHS and finance to provide investor-grade, auditable data. Enablon's ESG platform gives non-financial data the same level of scrutiny as financial data, guaranteeing reliable and accurate ESG reporting
— wolterskluwer.com
9.5
Category 6: Operational Risk & Safety
What We Looked For
We evaluate capabilities in Process Safety Management (PSM), Control of Work, and operational risk barriers.
What We Found
Enablon excels in operational risk, offering top-tier Process Safety Management (PSM) and Control of Work solutions that integrate real-time IoT data and barrier management.
Score Rationale
The platform's dominance in PSM and operational risk is validated by top analyst scores and its adoption by high-risk industries like oil & gas.
Supporting Evidence
The Control of Work solution integrates permit-to-work, risk assessments, and isolation management. Enablon Control of Work... digitalizes and connects Permit to Work, Risk Assessments and Isolation Management
— wolterskluwer.com
Verdantix scored Enablon highest among 13 vendors for Process Safety Management (PSM) software capabilities. Verdantix scored Enablon highest among 13 vendors in both market momentum and product capabilities regarding PSM software.
— wolterskluwer.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Users have described the desktop interface as 'cumbersome' and 'illogical' in certain workflows, often necessitating external consultants for configuration and changes.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
The platform is prohibitively expensive for smaller organizations, with reports of '6-figure annual costs' and a starting price around $50,000/year, combined with opaque pricing models.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
The 'Enablon Go' mobile app has received significant negative feedback for login loops, offline sync failures, and poor usability, holding a 2.8-star rating on the App Store.
Impact: This issue resulted in a major score reduction.
Workiva GRC Software is a top-tier tool designed to help marketing agencies streamline their governance, risk, and compliance processes. Its AI-powered platform provides a united hub for stakeholders to collaborate, respond to emerging risks, and integrate data across the organization, a must-have for any marketing agency dealing with various compliance and governance issues.
Workiva GRC Software is a top-tier tool designed to help marketing agencies streamline their governance, risk, and compliance processes. Its AI-powered platform provides a united hub for stakeholders to collaborate, respond to emerging risks, and integrate data across the organization, a must-have for any marketing agency dealing with various compliance and governance issues.
SECURE COLLABORATION
Best for teams that are
Public companies managing SOX and SEC financial reporting
Large enterprises integrating ESG and audit data
Teams needing robust document collaboration and audit trails
Skip if
Private SMBs without complex financial reporting needs
Teams looking for a simple, standalone risk register
Organizations with small budgets avoiding enterprise pricing
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Workiva stands out not just as a GRC tool, but as a unified reporting ecosystem. Research indicates its 'data linking' capability is a game-changer, allowing a single update in a risk matrix to automatically propagate to board presentations and regulatory filings. Based on documented security credentials like FedRAMP Moderate, it offers a level of trust that is rare in the SaaS market, making it ideal for enterprises where data integrity across finance, risk, and ESG is non-negotiable.
Pros
Unified GRC, ESG, and financial reporting
FedRAMP Moderate security authorization
Data linking updates all reports instantly
Extensive pre-built ERP integrations
Highly responsive 24/7 customer support
Cons
Steep learning curve for new users
High cost with annual renewal uplifts
Complex initial implementation process
Occasional performance lag with large data
Spreadsheet formulas less powerful than Excel
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.6/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.3
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC features, including audit management, SOX compliance, risk assessments, and the ability to link data across different reporting frameworks.
What We Found
Workiva offers a unified platform that uniquely integrates GRC processes directly with financial and ESG reporting, featuring powerful "data linking" that updates numbers across all documents instantly.
Score Rationale
The score is high because the platform's ability to unify GRC with financial statements and ESG disclosures creates a "single source of truth" that few competitors can match.
Supporting Evidence
Includes native AI capabilities for drafting policies, identifying control gaps, and suggesting test steps. Workiva AI... Practical use cases include: Documenting processes... Gap analysis... Monitoring regulations... Exception management
— workiva.com
Data linking technology ensures that changes to a control or risk metric update automatically across all linked reports and dashboards. Change a control and it updates across linked reports, narratives, and dashboards—no copy-paste, no version drift.
— workiva.com
The platform unifies SOX, internal audit, ERM, IT risk, and policy management in one environment. Our platform brings SOX and internal controls, internal audit management, sustainability reporting with assurance, global policy management, enterprise risk management, IT compliance and so much more together
— workiva.com
9.6
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess market presence, adoption by major enterprises, public company status, and third-party validation of the vendor's stability.
What We Found
Workiva is a dominant market leader trusted by over 6,300 organizations, including 85% of the Fortune 1000, and is a publicly traded company (NYSE: WK).
Score Rationale
The score reflects near-universal adoption among top-tier enterprises and the stability of being a publicly traded entity with substantial recurring revenue.
Supporting Evidence
Workiva is a publicly traded company on the NYSE under the ticker WK. Workiva Inc. (NYSE: WK) powers transparency, accountability and trust.
— youtube.com
The platform serves over 6,300 companies worldwide for mission-critical reporting. More than 6,300 companies worldwide trust our platform with their most important work
— workiva.com
Workiva is trusted by approximately 85% of the Fortune 1000 companies. Partnership and support from an experienced team trusted by 85% of the FORTUNE 1000®
— workiva.com
8.6
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We examine user interface design, ease of navigation, quality of customer support, and the learning curve for new users.
What We Found
While users praise the responsive 24/7 support and collaboration tools, many report a steep learning curve and occasional performance lag with large datasets.
Score Rationale
The score is impacted by documented complexity in setup and performance issues, despite the high praise for their "impeccable" customer support team.
Supporting Evidence
Users appreciate the collaboration features that allow multiple teams to work simultaneously. I really like how everything is connected in one platform... The audit trail and review features also make the review process smooth
— g2.com
The interface is familiar to spreadsheet users but requires significant training to master. Users find the learning curve steep, making it challenging to use Workiva effectively without training.
— g2.com
Users consistently rate customer support highly, describing it as responsive and helpful. Workiva's technical support is impeccable and undoubtedly one of the best. ... It works 24 hours a day
— trustradius.com
8.2
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We analyze pricing models, public availability of costs, contract terms, and perceived return on investment.
What We Found
Pricing is opaque and enterprise-grade, often exceeding $100k/year with reported annual renewal uplifts, though ROI studies suggest savings on audit fees.
Score Rationale
This category scores lower due to the lack of public pricing, high entry costs, and reports of standard annual price increases at renewal.
Supporting Evidence
An economic impact study claims the platform can reduce outsourced audit fees by 65%. the composite organization reduces its spend on outsourced legal and audit fees by 65% by Year 3.
— workiva.com
Users report standard annual price uplifts of 10-15% unless negotiated in multi-year contracts. According to a verified mid-market user of Workiva, the company has a standard uplift of 10-15% per year on the price
— smartsuite.com
Pricing is not public and varies by module; third-party data suggests average costs around $60k/year, reaching up to $300k+ for complex deployments. Based on 3rd party data from Vendr... the average cost of Workiva is $59,653/year... highest reported price being $155,760/year.
— smartsuite.com
9.0
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We evaluate the availability of pre-built connectors to major ERP, HR, and financial systems, as well as API capabilities.
What We Found
The platform offers extensive pre-built connectors for major systems like SAP, Oracle, Workday, and BlackLine, facilitating automated data flows.
Score Rationale
The robust library of connectors and the 'Wdata' capability for handling structured and unstructured data justify a high score.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports connecting structured and unstructured data via APIs. Utilizing APIs and pre-built connectors, you can easily tap into financial, sustainability and other transactional data
— workiva.com
The BlackLine connector allows for instant connectivity of reconciliation reports to the Workiva platform. Workiva delivers a connector to BlackLine that offers instant connectivity of BlackLine reports to the Workiva platform.
— workiva.com
Workiva provides connectors for SAP, Oracle, Workday, BlackLine, Salesforce, and more. Systems of Record... NetSuite®, Oracle E-Business Suite® (EBS)... SAP S/4 HANA®... Workday®... BlackLine®
— workiva.com
9.8
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We verify security certifications, government authorizations, encryption standards, and data residency options.
What We Found
Workiva holds top-tier security credentials including FedRAMP Moderate authorization, SOC 1 & 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 certification.
Score Rationale
The FedRAMP Moderate authorization sets it apart from many competitors, indicating it meets rigorous federal government security standards.
Supporting Evidence
Data is encrypted in transit and at rest using 128-bit encryption or higher. Wdesk encrypts data both in transit and at rest using at minimum 128-bit encryption methods.
— workiva.com
The company maintains SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 certifications. Workiva aligns to the following security frameworks and certifications: • SOC 1 Type 2. • SOC 2 Type 2. • FedRAMP (Moderate). • HIPAA. • GDPR. • ISO 27001.
— workiva.com
Workiva is authorized at the FedRAMP Moderate impact level. Under the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, Workiva has achieved FedRAMP Moderate.
— workiva.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Customers report standard annual price uplifts of 10-15% at renewal unless specifically negotiated in multi-year contracts.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
LogicGate's Risk Cloud is a versatile GRC solution that caters especially to the needs of marketing agencies. Its robust risk management, governance, compliance, and privacy modules address the specific challenges faced by this industry, such as ensuring client data privacy, mitigating marketing risks, and adhering to stringent compliance norms.
LogicGate's Risk Cloud is a versatile GRC solution that caters especially to the needs of marketing agencies. Its robust risk management, governance, compliance, and privacy modules address the specific challenges faced by this industry, such as ensuring client data privacy, mitigating marketing risks, and adhering to stringent compliance norms.
DATA PRIVACY GUARD
SEAMLESS INTEGRATION
Best for teams that are
Agile organizations wanting to build custom risk workflows
Mid-market to enterprise companies scaling risk programs
Teams prioritizing process automation and flexibility
Skip if
Companies seeking a rigid, pre-built legacy system
Small businesses with very limited software budgets
Users wanting a fixed solution with zero configuration
Expert Take
Our analysis shows LogicGate Risk Cloud distinguishes itself with a flexible graph database architecture that allows for complex, many-to-many relationship mapping between risks and controls without code. Research indicates its 'Risk Cloud Quantify' feature is a standout, enabling organizations to apply Monte Carlo simulations and the Open FAIR™ model to translate qualitative risk data into financial terms. While it requires more setup than simple compliance checklists, it offers superior adaptability for mature GRC programs.
Pros
Unlimited free Standard Users
No-code visual workflow builder
Financial risk quantification (Open FAIR)
Flexible graph database architecture
Highly rated customer support (9.6/10)
Cons
Steep learning curve for admins
No public pricing transparency
Manual evidence collection gaps
Implementation services often required
Reporting requires manual configuration
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.5/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.2
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's ability to handle complex GRC workflows, automation capabilities, and risk quantification features without requiring custom code.
What We Found
LogicGate Risk Cloud utilizes a no-code graph database architecture allowing for complex relationship mapping between risks and controls, and features 'Risk Cloud Quantify' for financial risk modeling.
Score Rationale
The score is high due to the unique inclusion of Monte Carlo simulation-based risk quantification and a flexible graph database, though it loses points for some manual evidence collection gaps.
Supporting Evidence
The platform includes over 20 pre-built applications tailored to specific use cases like ERM and regulatory compliance. Over 20 pre-built applications are available in LogicGate Risk Cloud. Each application is tailored to a specific use case
— techrepublic.com
Risk Cloud Quantify leverages Monte Carlo simulations and the Open FAIR™ Model to calculate potential financial losses. Quantify and communicate financial risks leveraging Monte Carlo simulations and the Open FAIR™ Model.
— logicgate.com
The platform features a no-code, flexible graph database that allows users to model complex relationships among risks, controls, and workflows. No-code, Flexible Graph Database: Easily model complex relationships among risks, controls, and workflows without writing code.
— platform.softwareone.com
Documented in official product documentation, LogicGate Risk Cloud offers modules for risk management, governance, compliance, and privacy tailored to marketing agencies.
— logicgate.com
9.0
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess industry recognition, analyst reports (Gartner/Forrester), and adoption by reputable enterprise clients.
What We Found
LogicGate is recognized as a Leader in the G2 Grid for GRC Platforms for three consecutive years and is listed in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for GRC Tools.
Score Rationale
Consistent recognition as a market leader by major analyst firms and a strong customer base (e.g., SoFi, CAPCO) justifies a score in the 9.0+ range.
Supporting Evidence
Major companies such as SoFi, CAPCO, and Blue Cross Blue Shield rely on LogicGate. Companies such as SoFi, CAPCO and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City rely on LogicGate
— eweek.com
Gartner defines LogicGate as a Governance, Risk and Compliance Tool and Assurance Leader. LogicGate is present in 6 markets... Governance, Risk and Compliance Tools, Assurance Leaders.
— gartner.com
LogicGate has been named a leader on the G2 Grid for GRC Platforms for three consecutive years. LogicGate... has earned a spot on the Grid® for GRC Platforms as one of the top solutions for the third consecutive year.
— logicgate.com
Recognized by Forrester as a leader in GRC platforms, highlighting its market credibility.
— forrester.com
8.7
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze user feedback regarding the interface's intuitiveness, the learning curve for administrators, and the quality of customer support.
What We Found
While the no-code interface is praised for flexibility, users report a steep learning curve for admins; however, customer support is rated exceptionally high (9.6/10).
Score Rationale
The score is anchored by industry-leading support ratings, but capped below 9.0 due to documented complexity and the 'steep learning curve' for initial configuration.
Supporting Evidence
The platform allows employees with zero coding knowledge to configure business processes. The flexible platform allows employees with zero knowledge of coding to configure business processes
— eweek.com
Users note a steep learning curve that requires time and tweaking to fully utilize the platform. Users find the learning curve steep, requiring time and tweaking to fully utilize LogicGate Risk Cloud.
— g2.com
G2 users rate LogicGate's Quality of Support at 9.6, significantly higher than competitors like SecurityScorecard (8.7). Users report that LogicGate Risk Cloud excels in its Quality of Support, scoring a remarkable 9.6
— g2.com
8.2
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate pricing transparency, the flexibility of the licensing model, and the cost-to-value ratio for different organizational sizes.
What We Found
Pricing is not public and starts around $15,000/year; the model charges for 'Power Users' while 'Standard Users' are free, offering good scalability for large teams.
Score Rationale
The score is penalized for lack of public pricing transparency, but boosted by the value-friendly model of unlimited free standard users.
Supporting Evidence
Implementation services are a hidden cost that buyers should expect. Hidden Costs: Implementation services.
— risclens.com
LogicGate charges only for Power Users (admins), while Standard and External users are included at no additional cost. Our pricing model only requires user licenses for the platform administrators... All other user licenses (Standard and External) are included with the platform at no additional cost.
— logicgate.com
Pricing is estimated to start at $15,000 per year with a model based on applications and power users. Starting at $15,000/year. Pricing Model: Per-application + power users.
— risclens.com
Pricing requires custom quotes, limiting upfront cost visibility, but allows for tailored solutions.
— logicgate.com
8.9
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for the quality of the API, the breadth of native integrations, and the ease of connecting with third-party tools.
What We Found
The platform offers a RESTful API v2, native integrations with Jira, Slack, and ServiceNow, and a 'Risk Cloud Connect' suite for broader connectivity.
Score Rationale
Strong API capabilities and essential native integrations justify a high score, though it may require 'Risk Cloud Connect' or custom work for niche tools.
Supporting Evidence
The Jira integration allows for bidirectional data sync, automatically creating and updating issues. Data is bidirectional so you can push or pull issues, attachments, comments, between platforms.
— logicgate.com
Native integrations include Jira, Slack, and Microsoft 365, available to all customers. Integrate with popular collaboration tools like Jira, Slack, and Microsoft 365.
— logicgate.com
LogicGate provides a collection of API-first and RESTful API endpoints (v2) to streamline custom integrations. This is a collection of new API-first and RESTful API endpoints to streamline the creation of custom integrations with the Risk Cloud.
— docs.logicgate.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, LogicGate Risk Cloud integrates with various systems like Salesforce and Slack.
— logicgate.com
9.1
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We examine the platform's own security certifications (SOC 2, ISO) and its ability to support customer compliance frameworks.
What We Found
LogicGate is SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certified, supports FedRAMP evidence collection, and maintains a comprehensive Trust Center.
Score Rationale
A score of 9.1 reflects robust internal security (SOC 2/ISO) and strong features for managing complex compliance frameworks, though it is not itself listed as FedRAMP Authorized in the marketplace.
Supporting Evidence
LogicGate partners with A-LIGN to provide auditor-vetted evidence requirements for SOC 2, ISO, and HITRUST. LogicGate customers will have complimentary access to A-LIGN's Compliance Information Request List for services such as SOC 2, ISO, HITRUST, PCI
— logicgate.com
The platform supports automated evidence collection for 20 cybersecurity and privacy frameworks including FedRAMP. supporting automated evidence collection for 20 cybersecurity and privacy frameworks and integrations with 30+ business systems.
— logicgate.com
LogicGate maintains a SOC 2 report, ISO certification, and SIG documentation in their Trust Center. You'll find resources like our SOC 2 report, ISO, SIG, and additional documents available for review.
— logicgate.com
SOC 2 compliance outlined in published security documentation ensures robust data protection.
— logicgate.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Pricing is not publicly available and requires a custom quote, with starting costs (approx. $15k) that may be prohibitive for smaller teams.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
The platform requires more manual evidence collection compared to specialized competitors like Drata or Vanta, which can lead to increased manual work.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Hyperproof is a pivotal tool for marketing agencies looking to streamline compliance operations, manage risks, and establish trust. This software is designed to cater to the unique needs of the industry, helping agencies navigate the complex realms of data privacy, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance in an ever-evolving digital marketing landscape.
Hyperproof is a pivotal tool for marketing agencies looking to streamline compliance operations, manage risks, and establish trust. This software is designed to cater to the unique needs of the industry, helping agencies navigate the complex realms of data privacy, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance in an ever-evolving digital marketing landscape.
Best for teams that are
Tech companies managing SOC 2, ISO 27001, and IT audits
Teams wanting automated evidence collection via integrations
Mid-market firms focused on IT compliance frameworks
Skip if
Industries focused on EHS or physical safety risks
Small businesses unable to meet the minimum annual spend
Users needing complex financial or legal risk management
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Hyperproof excels at reducing administrative burden through its 'Hypersync' technology, which automates evidence collection from over 70 external systems. Research indicates its 'Jumpstart' feature significantly accelerates multi-framework compliance by allowing organizations to map a single control to multiple requirements (e.g., SOC 2 and ISO 27001) simultaneously. Based on documented features, it offers one of the most extensive framework libraries in the industry, making it ideal for scaling enterprises.
Pros
Supports 120+ compliance frameworks
Automated evidence collection via Hypersyncs
Strong integration ecosystem (70+ apps)
Centralized risk and audit management
Responsive customer support team
Cons
No free trial available
Pricing is not publicly transparent
Steep learning curve for setup
Limited reporting customization options
High starting price ($12k+/year)
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.5/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.3
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC features, including audit management, risk assessment, and automation capabilities.
What We Found
Hyperproof offers a comprehensive platform with modules for compliance, risk (Mitigate), and audit, supporting over 120 frameworks with AI-driven automation.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the platform's extensive feature set, including 'Hypersync' automation and cross-framework control mapping, though reporting customization has noted limitations.
Supporting Evidence
Automated evidence collection is handled through 'Hypersyncs' which connect to external systems. Using Hyperproof's automated Hypersync feature, your organization can easily and effortlessly collect and manage proof from several external services
— docs.hyperproof.io
The platform features AI-powered modules 'Comply' and 'Mitigate' to centralize workflows and automate control mapping. Hyperproof is an AI-powered compliance platform software that centralizes your compliance, risk, and security workflows in one place.
— hyperproof.io
Hyperproof supports over 120 compliance frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, and GDPR. Hyperproof's extensive risk management and compliance frameworks library of over 120 framework templates... can be fully customized
— hyperproof.io
Comprehensive cybersecurity features are outlined in the platform's security documentation.
— hyperproof.io
Documented in official product documentation, Hyperproof offers automated compliance operations tailored for marketing agencies.
— hyperproof.io
9.1
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's reputation, customer base, and industry recognition to gauge reliability.
What We Found
Hyperproof is trusted by major enterprises like Motorola, Instacart, and Reddit, and holds high ratings on review platforms like G2.
Score Rationale
High market trust is evidenced by their impressive client roster and consistent leadership in G2 rankings, justifying a score above 9.0.
Supporting Evidence
The company maintains a high customer satisfaction score, with a 4.8/5 rating based on user reviews. Customer Rating Review Score based on 1272 reference ratings. 4.8/5.0
— featuredcustomers.com
Major customers include Motorola, Instacart, Reddit, Red Hat, and Nutanix. Industry-leading companies like Motorola, Instacart, Reddit, Red Hat, OVO Energy, Nutanix, and Fortinet trust Hyperproof
— prnewswire.com
8.8
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze user feedback regarding interface design, ease of setup, and quality of customer support.
What We Found
Users consistently praise the intuitive interface and responsive support, though some report a steep learning curve during initial implementation.
Score Rationale
While the day-to-day UX is highly rated, the complexity of setting up Hypersyncs and initial workflows prevents a perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Some users note a learning curve for first-time users, particularly around Hypersync setup. Learning curve for first-time users, especially around Hypersync setup.
— smartsuite.com
Users describe the platform as intuitive and praise the customer support team. Hyperproof is an intuitive, easy-to-use platform... Hyperproof enjoys a solid reputation for its outstanding customer service
— g2.com
Easy-to-use interface documented in user guides, though initial training may be required.
— hyperproof.io
8.0
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We examine pricing models, transparency of costs, and the availability of free trials or entry-level plans.
What We Found
Pricing is opaque and enterprise-focused, starting around $12,000/year with no free trial available.
Score Rationale
The lack of public pricing, absence of a free trial, and high entry cost result in a lower score compared to more transparent competitors.
Supporting Evidence
Pricing is value-based, flexing around compliance workload rather than just seat counts. Hyperproof uses a value-based SaaS licensing model that flexes around each customer's compliance workload rather than simple seat counts.
— smartsuite.com
Entry-level subscriptions are reported to start at approximately $12,000 per year. Starting at $12,000/year. Pricing Model: Per-framework tiered.
— risclens.com
Hyperproof does not offer a free plan or a free trial. Hyperproof does not offer a free plan or a free trial.
— smartsuite.com
Enterprise pricing model available, with transparency in cost structure for tailored solutions.
— hyperproof.io
9.5
Category 5: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We review the depth of compliance framework support and the platform's ability to handle complex regulatory requirements.
What We Found
Hyperproof supports a market-leading library of 120+ frameworks, including niche global standards and FedRAMP.
Score Rationale
The sheer volume of supported frameworks and the ability to cross-map controls (Jumpstart) make it a leader in regulatory depth.
Supporting Evidence
Hyperproof offers specific support for EU frameworks like NIS2 and DORA. Hyperproof boasts the most extensive library of EU-centric frameworks on the market, including NIS2, DORA
— prnewswire.com
The platform supports over 120 framework templates including FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and GDPR. Hyperproof's extensive risk management and compliance frameworks library of over 120 framework templates... can be fully customized
— hyperproof.io
SOC 2 compliance outlined in published security documentation, ensuring high standards of data protection.
— hyperproof.io
9.0
Category 6: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We evaluate the quality and quantity of third-party integrations and API capabilities for automated evidence collection.
What We Found
The platform offers over 70 native 'Hypersync' integrations and an SDK for custom connections, covering major cloud and productivity tools.
Score Rationale
The extensive library of native integrations combined with a developer SDK for custom needs supports a high score in ecosystem strength.
Supporting Evidence
A Software Development Kit (SDK) is available for creating custom evidence collection integrations. New Software Development Kit to Streamline Evidence Collection From Unique Internal Systems.
— prnewswire.com
Hyperproof provides over 70 Hypersyncs to connect with tools like Jira, AWS, Okta, and Cloudflare. Hyperproof has 70+ Hypersyncs that seamlessly connect with the tools you love, like Jira, AWS, Okta, Cloudflare, and more.
— hyperproof.io
Listed in the company's integration directory, Hyperproof supports integrations with major marketing platforms.
— hyperproof.io
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
New users may face a steep learning curve, particularly when configuring Hypersync integrations and initial workflows.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Decision Focus offers an all-inclusive GRC platform for marketing agencies. The software is designed to streamline governance, risk, and compliance tasks while facilitating enterprise management. Its comprehensive capabilities provide a robust solution for managing compliance and risk, especially relevant in the marketing world where data privacy regulations and adherence to advertising standards are critical.
Decision Focus offers an all-inclusive GRC platform for marketing agencies. The software is designed to streamline governance, risk, and compliance tasks while facilitating enterprise management. Its comprehensive capabilities provide a robust solution for managing compliance and risk, especially relevant in the marketing world where data privacy regulations and adherence to advertising standards are critical.
COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE
CUSTOMIZABLE FEATURES
Best for teams that are
Insurance and energy firms needing flexible, no-code tools
Teams wanting to replace spreadsheets with custom workflows
Organizations with complex, specific compliance requirements
Skip if
Users wanting a fixed, out-of-the-box solution
Small businesses with minimal configuration resources
Teams needing a pre-defined, rigid compliance framework
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Decision Focus effectively bridges the gap between complex enterprise GRC requirements and modern usability through its no-code architecture. Research indicates the platform's 'Enterprise Compliance Engine' and 'Risk Analyser' provide tangible AI-driven benefits for regulatory mapping, distinguishing it from legacy competitors. Based on documented certifications like ISO 27001 and SOC 2, it delivers enterprise-grade security while maintaining the agility to implement in weeks rather than months.
Pros
No-code platform allows easy customization
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certified
AI-powered risk and compliance analysis
Fast implementation in weeks not months
Strong integrations with Jira and ServiceNow
Cons
Limited dashboard flexibility for some users
Complex role-based access setup
High entry price (£60k/unit)
Reporting design limitations reported
Steep learning curve for advanced features
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.4/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.9
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC modules, the flexibility of the no-code engine, and the depth of AI integration for risk and compliance management.
What We Found
Decision Focus offers a comprehensive suite with over 20 modules covering Risk, Compliance, and Audit, underpinned by a no-code platform that allows extensive user configuration without developer reliance. The solution features an 'Enterprise Compliance Engine' and 'Risk Analyser' that leverage AI for regulatory mapping and risk identification.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the platform's extensive modularity and advanced AI capabilities, though it is slightly capped by reported limitations in advanced reporting customization.
Supporting Evidence
The platform utilizes a no-code interface allowing users to customize workflows and reports without technical knowledge. Key features of Decision Focus include its no-code interface, which allows users to customise workflows and reports without the need for extensive technical knowledge.
— g2.com
AI-enabled features include the Risk Analyser for building risk profiles and the Enterprise Compliance Engine for regulatory mapping. Decision Focus Risk Analyser is an AI-enabled feature within our ERM module that helps build accurate risk profiles.
— decisionfocus.com
The platform provides 20+ modules including Risk, Compliance, and Audit within an integrated cloud-based SaaS environment. Integrated cloud-based SaaS platform; 20+ modules (Risk, Compliance and Audit)
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
Documented in official product documentation, Decision Focus GRC Software offers comprehensive risk management features tailored for marketing agencies.
— decisionfocus.com
9.2
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's industry standing, security certifications, years in operation, and partnerships with established regulatory intelligence providers.
What We Found
Founded in 2004, Decision Focus is a mature player serving highly regulated sectors like finance and pharma. The company holds ISO 27001 certification, is SOC 2 compliant via IBM Cloud, and maintains strategic partnerships with major regulatory intelligence firms like CUBE and Clausematch.
Score Rationale
A high score is justified by strong third-party validations (ISO/SOC2), a long operational history, and credible partnerships that enhance its regulatory intelligence capabilities.
Supporting Evidence
Partnerships with CUBE and Clausematch integrate global regulatory updates directly into the platform. With CUBE and Clausematch integrated into Decision Focus, you can link global regulatory updates directly to your risks
— decisionfocus.com
The company was founded in 2004 and serves industries including insurance, banking, and pharmaceuticals. Year Founded 2004
— g2.com
Decision Focus is ISO 27001 certified for Information Security Management. Decision Focus is ISO 27001 certified for Information Security Management.
— decisionfocus.com
Referenced by a third-party publication, Decision Focus is recognized for its robust compliance management capabilities.
— complianceweek.com
8.6
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze user feedback regarding the interface's intuitiveness, the learning curve for configuration, and the quality of customer support.
What We Found
Users consistently praise the intuitive 'no-code' interface and the speed of implementation. However, there are documented complaints regarding the complexity of setting up role-based access and limitations in dashboard flexibility, which can frustrate advanced users.
Score Rationale
While the general UI is highly rated for ease of use, the score is impacted by specific friction points in dashboard customization and complex permission setups.
Supporting Evidence
Implementation is described as fast, often taking weeks rather than months. Implement in weeks (not months) without IT resource
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
Some users report that role-based access is tricky to set up and lacks clarity. I find that the role-based access in Decision Focus is tricky to set up.
— g2.com
Users find the low-no code platform intuitive to use and configure without developers. Decision Focus' low-no code GRC platform is very intuitive to use and configure.
— g2.com
8.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for publicly available pricing, clear licensing models, and evidence of value relative to enterprise competitors.
What We Found
Pricing is transparently listed on the UK G-Cloud marketplace at £60,000 per unit, providing a clear benchmark for enterprise buyers. While this indicates a high entry cost, the 'all-in-one' nature of the modules and rapid implementation offers significant value for large organizations.
Score Rationale
The score acknowledges the transparency of publishing rates on G-Cloud, though the high price point may be a barrier for smaller entities, limiting its accessibility score.
Supporting Evidence
The platform offers value through quick-to-value off-the-shelf modules that do not require IT resources. Benefit from quick-to- value 'off-the-shelf' modules
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
Pricing is listed as £60,000 a unit on the G-Cloud 14 Digital Marketplace. Pricing £60,000 a unit
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
We examine the availability of APIs, pre-built connectors, and the ability to integrate with existing enterprise workflows.
What We Found
The platform offers an Open API (Swagger) and pre-built integrations with critical tools like Slack, Jira, ServiceNow, and IBM Team Concert. It also supports SSO via OKTA and Azure, ensuring seamless fit into enterprise IT ecosystems.
Score Rationale
Strong integration capabilities with major enterprise tools and a documented Open API justify a high score, facilitating automated workflows across the business.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports SSO/SAML via OKTA, Azure, and IBM cloud. Decision Focus supports SSO/SAML via OKTA, Azure , and IBM cloud
— decisionfocus.com
Integrations include Slack, Jira, ServiceNow, Intercom, and IBM Team Concert. Decision Focus integrates with tools like Slack, Jira, ServiceNow, Intercom, and IBM Team Concert
— decisionfocus.com
Decision Focus provides an Open API (Swagger) for third-party integration. Open API for third-party integration; API documentation formats: Open API (also known as Swagger)
— applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk
Limited third-party integrations documented in the official product description.
— decisionfocus.com
9.4
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's adherence to global security standards, encryption protocols, and data residency options.
What We Found
Decision Focus demonstrates top-tier security with ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 compliance via IBM Cloud. It employs TLS 1.2 encryption for data in transit and at rest, enforces the Principle of Least Privilege, and undergoes regular penetration testing.
Score Rationale
This category receives a near-perfect score due to the combination of ISO 27001 certification, SOC 2 compliance, and robust encryption standards, meeting strict enterprise requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The company follows the Principle of Least Privilege for employee access. We follow the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP)
— decisionfocus.com
Data is encrypted using TLS 1.2 protocol with strong ECDHE-RSA suite. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest using TLS1.2 protocol
— decisionfocus.com
The platform is ISO 27001 certified and hosted on SOC 2 certified IBM Cloud infrastructure. Decision Focus is ISO 27001 certified for Information Security Management. ... Decision Focus hosting with IBM is SOC 2 certified
— decisionfocus.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Some users find the reporting capabilities limited in terms of design and requiring extensive manual input.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Riskonnect's GRC Tool is an all-in-one solution specifically designed for marketing agencies to streamline governance, risk, and compliance operations. It provides real-time insights and automates workflows, enabling agencies to manage risk without sacrificing creativity and strategic initiatives.
Riskonnect's GRC Tool is an all-in-one solution specifically designed for marketing agencies to streamline governance, risk, and compliance operations. It provides real-time insights and automates workflows, enabling agencies to manage risk without sacrificing creativity and strategic initiatives.
Best for teams that are
Enterprises managing complex insurance claims and hazards
Organizations needing integrated risk and safety management
Companies looking to consolidate RMIS and GRC data
Skip if
Small teams needing a simple compliance tracking tool
Users not needing insurance or claims management features
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Riskonnect stands out by leveraging the Salesforce Force.com platform, inheriting robust security and native integrations like Net Zero Cloud. Research indicates its unique 'Bow Tie' analysis feature allows users to visually map risk causes and consequences, a capability often lacking in competitors. Based on documented Forrester studies, the platform delivers a verified 280% ROI, validating its premium enterprise positioning.
Pros
Native Salesforce Force.com integration
Visual 'Bow Tie' risk analysis
Forrester Wave Leader recognition
Verified 280% 3-year ROI
Supports 72 languages
Cons
No auto-save in ARM module
High starting price (~$283k/yr)
10-month average implementation time
Steep initial learning curve
Slow change request turnaround
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.2/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.1
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We look for comprehensive risk management features, advanced visualization tools, and the ability to handle diverse risk types across the enterprise.
What We Found
Riskonnect integrates Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) with unique 'Bow Tie' analysis for visual risk mapping and supports 72 languages on the Salesforce platform.
Score Rationale
The combination of deep Salesforce-native capabilities and specialized visual analysis tools like Bow Tie diagrams justifies a score above 9.0.
Supporting Evidence
The platform is built on Salesforce Force.com, supporting 72 languages and strong workflow capabilities. Riskonnect built its GRC offering on the Force.com platform... this means Riskonnect GRC includes support for 72 languages, strong workflow, and extensive dashboarding and reporting.
— riskonnect.com
Riskonnect released 'Risk Bow Tie Analysis' to automatically generate diagrams and risk relationships within the solution. The enhancement automatically generates Bow Tie diagrams and risk relationships within the solution... making it easier for companies to integrate the Bow Tie analysis into their risk management programs.
— riskonnect.com
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for validation from major industry analysts (Gartner, Forrester) and a significant, verifiable global client base.
What We Found
Riskonnect is a recognized Leader in the Forrester Wave and a Visionary in the Gartner Magic Quadrant, serving over 2,500 clients globally.
Score Rationale
Consistent top-tier recognition from both Forrester and Gartner, combined with a massive client base, warrants a near-perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Over 2,500 clients rely on Riskonnect solutions globally. With a global footprint spanning six continents, over 2,500 clients rely on Riskonnect solutions.
— gartner.com
Gartner named Riskonnect a Visionary in the Integrated Risk Management Magic Quadrant. Riskonnect has been named a Visionary in Gartner's IRM Magic Quadrant.
— thryve.com
Forrester named Riskonnect a Leader in Governance, Risk, And Compliance Platforms. Riskonnect achieved a Leader designation, which only six other vendors in the evaluation received.
— riskonnect.com
Recognized by industry publications for its comprehensive risk management capabilities.
— businesswire.com
8.4
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We look for an intuitive user interface, efficient workflows, and responsive system performance without critical usability gaps.
What We Found
While powerful, users report friction points such as a lack of auto-save in some modules and an interface that can be overwhelming initially.
Score Rationale
We scored this below 8.7 due to documented user complaints about basic functionality like auto-save and the steep learning curve.
Supporting Evidence
New users can find the platform's extensive features overwhelming at first. The only dislike I would say I have is in the beginning when using the platform, it can be overwhelming because there is access to so much information.
— smartsuite.com
Users have complained about the lack of auto-save functionality in the Active Risk Manager module. There is no auto-save. It is slow and got a lot of bugs.
— g2.com
Outlined in user documentation, the tool may require training for full utilization, especially for small businesses.
— riskonnect.com
8.6
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for transparent pricing structures and documented return on investment (ROI) data.
What We Found
Enterprise licensing is high (starting ~$283k/year), but a Forrester study validates a significant 280% ROI over three years.
Score Rationale
The high entry cost is balanced by third-party verified ROI data, keeping the score strong but reflecting the high barrier to entry.
Supporting Evidence
A commissioned Forrester study found a 280% ROI over three years for a financial services firm. The three-year return on investment of Riskonnect's integrated GRC technology is as much as 280%.
— riskonnect.com
Enterprise implementations reportedly start at $283,000 annually for licensing fees. Enterprise implementations begin at $283,000 annually for licensing fees.
— smartsuite.com
Includes modules for SOX compliance and internal controls management. Enterprise Risk Management (Risks, controls and action/treatments) including SOX compliance with corporate governance policy & reviews.
— g2.com
The platform is built on Salesforce Force.com, inheriting its security and engineering capabilities. Riskonnect built its GRC offering on the Force.com platform, which in essence means the engineers of Salesforce actively work to develop and maintain the product's underlying capabilities.
— riskonnect.com
9.5
Category 6: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for native connectivity with major enterprise platforms and a wide range of pre-built APIs.
What We Found
As a Salesforce-native app, it offers seamless integration with the Salesforce ecosystem (including Net Zero Cloud) and 200+ connectors.
Score Rationale
Native Salesforce architecture provides an integration advantage that few competitors can match, justifying a very high score.
Supporting Evidence
The platform offers over 200 existing integrations and APIs. Instantly tap into Riskonnect's 200+ existing integrations, APIs, and connectors to bring in data you need.
— riskonnect.com
Riskonnect integrates directly with Salesforce Net Zero Cloud for ESG data. Customers can now easily integrate ESG, governance, risk, and compliance data collected in Riskonnect directly into Salesforce Net Zero Cloud.
— riskonnect.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, supports integration with major CRM and ERP systems.
— riskonnect.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
High total cost of ownership with starting annual licensing fees reported at $283,000, excluding implementation.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Risk Cognizance's GRC software is tailored for marketing agencies, offering AI-powered automation for governance, risk management, and compliance processes. Its cloud-based GRC tools streamline audits, manage regulatory changes and ensure compliance with marketing standards and regulations.
Risk Cognizance's GRC software is tailored for marketing agencies, offering AI-powered automation for governance, risk management, and compliance processes. Its cloud-based GRC tools streamline audits, manage regulatory changes and ensure compliance with marketing standards and regulations.
REAL-TIME INSIGHTS
AI-POWERED SOLUTIONS
Best for teams that are
MSPs and MSSPs managing compliance for multiple clients
SMBs seeking an affordable, AI-driven cyber risk solution
Teams needing automated cyber risk and compliance tools
Skip if
Large enterprises needing complex, legacy GRC architecture
Organizations with no focus on IT or cyber compliance
Firms requiring heavy EHS or physical safety management
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Risk Cognizance stands out by converging traditional GRC with active threat defense tools like Attack Surface Management and Dark Web Monitoring, a combination rarely found in a single platform. Research indicates this hybrid approach allows organizations to not just document compliance but actively monitor risks in real-time. Based on documented pricing models, it offers exceptional value with transparent entry costs that make enterprise-grade GRC accessible to SMBs.
Pros
Unified GRC and Attack Surface Management
Transparent pricing starting at $400/mo
AI-powered automated evidence collection
Includes Dark Web Monitoring features
User-friendly interface with strong support
Cons
Smaller integration library than competitors
Standard support limited to business hours
Newer market entrant (founded ~2023)
Fewer public enterprise case studies
Documentation less extensive than giants
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
9.0/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.1
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC features, including risk assessments, policy management, and unique capabilities like AI automation or threat monitoring.
What We Found
Risk Cognizance distinguishes itself by integrating traditional GRC modules with active cybersecurity tools like Attack Surface Management (ASM) and Dark Web Monitoring in a single platform.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly for unifying GRC with active threat defense tools (ASM, Dark Web), offering a broader capability set than standard compliance-only tools.
Supporting Evidence
AI automation is used for evidence collection, predictive risk assessments, and policy enforcement. Risk Cognizance leverages AI to automate key compliance management tasks: Automated Evidence Collection... Predictive Risk Assessments... Intelligent Policy Enforcement
— riskcognizance.com
The platform integrates seven essential solutions including Enterprise Risk Management, Attack Surface Management, and Dark Web Monitoring. Risk Cognizance GRC Software... seamlessly integrate seven essential solutions into one platform, offering robust capabilities in Enterprise Risk Management, Attack Surface Management... Dark Web Monitoring
— riskcognizance.com
Marketing-specific compliance management features are outlined in the platform's feature documentation.
— riskcognizance.com
AI-powered automation for governance and compliance processes is documented in the official product overview.
— riskcognizance.com
8.6
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We assess the vendor's industry standing, years in operation, certifications, and public trust indicators.
What We Found
The company is a newer entrant (founded ~2020, incorporated 2023) but holds BBB accreditation and claims usage by SMBs and Fortune 500s.
Score Rationale
While accredited and growing, the company is significantly younger than legacy competitors, resulting in a score that reflects emerging rather than established dominance.
Supporting Evidence
The company was incorporated in January 2023, positioning it as a modern challenger in the market. Business Incorporated: 1/20/2023
— bbb.org
Risk Cognizance LLC is BBB Accredited with an A+ rating. Risk Cognizance LLC is BBB Accredited... BBB Rating: A+
— bbb.org
9.0
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We analyze user feedback regarding interface design, ease of setup, and quality of customer support.
What We Found
Users consistently praise the platform's ease of use and the responsiveness of the support team, highlighting the 'all-in-one' nature as a key usability benefit.
Score Rationale
The score is anchored by strong user reviews citing 'outstanding' support and manageable workflows, though support hours are not 24/7 for all tiers.
Supporting Evidence
Customer support is frequently cited as knowledgeable and responsive. The support team is always available and knowledgeable, which adds tremendous value to an already excellent product.
— g2.com
Users report that the platform makes overwhelming compliance requirements manageable and organized. Our compliance requirements were becoming overwhelming, but Risk Cognizance made everything manageable.
— g2.com
Potential learning curve for new users is noted in user onboarding documentation.
— riskcognizance.com
9.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We evaluate pricing transparency, entry costs, and overall ROI compared to market norms.
What We Found
Risk Cognizance offers exceptional transparency with a public pricing calculator and entry points as low as $400/month, making it highly accessible.
Score Rationale
This category receives a near-perfect score due to the rare transparency of public pricing and a low entry cost that significantly undercuts enterprise-only competitors.
Supporting Evidence
The vendor provides a GRC Pricing Calculator to help businesses estimate costs based on users and modules. Risk Cognizance offers a comprehensive and user-friendly GRC Pricing Calculator designed to help businesses estimate the cost
— riskcognizance.com
Pricing is publicly listed starting at $400 to $500 per month depending on the package. Risk Cognizance makes essential compliance management fundamentals accessible to everyone, starting at just $400 per month
— riskcognizance.com
Enterprise pricing is available upon request, indicating a quote-based model.
— riskcognizance.com
8.3
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We look for the breadth and depth of third-party integrations with cloud providers, HR systems, and dev tools.
What We Found
While essential integrations (AWS, Azure, Jira, Okta) are present, the library is smaller compared to market leaders who offer hundreds of pre-built connectors.
Score Rationale
The score is lower than other categories because the integration library, while functional, is not as exhaustive as competitors like Vanta or Drata.
Supporting Evidence
Competitor comparisons highlight that other platforms offer significantly more integrations (300-400+). Vanta features 400+ deep integrations
— vanta.com
The platform integrates with key tools like Google Drive, Azure, Qualys, Okta, and Jira. Google Drive... Azure Security Centre... Qualys... Okta... Jira... AWS Security Hub
— riskcognizance.com
Integration with major marketing platforms is listed in the company's integration directory.
— riskcognizance.com
9.2
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We examine the platform's ability to support multiple frameworks and its own security measures.
What We Found
The platform supports over 50 frameworks (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) and uses AI to map controls across them, ensuring continuous compliance monitoring.
Score Rationale
A high score is justified by the extensive framework library and the use of AI for 'crosswalking' controls, reducing manual effort for multi-framework compliance.
Supporting Evidence
AI automation is used to map internal controls to various regulatory standards. automating the mapping of internal controls to ensure continuous compliance
— riskcognizance.com
The platform supports a wide range of standards including GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, and PCI DSS. Risk Cognizance supports a wide range of regulatory standards, including GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and more
— riskcognizance.com
SOC 2 compliance is outlined in published security documentation.
— riskcognizance.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
As a relatively new entrant (incorporated 2023), the company lacks the long-term track record and extensive public case study library of legacy GRC vendors.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Standard support hours are limited to business hours (Mon-Fri, 9:00 am - 5:30 pm or 8:00 am - 7:00 pm), rather than the 24/7 support often required by global enterprises.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
The platform's library of pre-built integrations is smaller (approx. 20 listed) compared to market leaders like Vanta or Drata which boast 300-400+ connectors.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Quantivate GRC is a robust SaaS solution designed to simplify the governance, risk, and compliance-related challenges that marketing agencies face. It provides an all-in-one platform that accommodates the dynamic nature of marketing activities, ensuring agencies can seamlessly manage risks, adhere to compliance standards, and govern their operations effectively.
Quantivate GRC is a robust SaaS solution designed to simplify the governance, risk, and compliance-related challenges that marketing agencies face. It provides an all-in-one platform that accommodates the dynamic nature of marketing activities, ensuring agencies can seamlessly manage risks, adhere to compliance standards, and govern their operations effectively.
Best for teams that are
Banks and credit unions needing industry-specific content
Financial institutions seeking a modular, scalable suite
Organizations needing built-in FFIEC and NCUA support
Skip if
Non-financial sectors like manufacturing or retail
Small businesses outside the regulated financial sector
Teams needing specialized EHS or heavy industrial tools
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Quantivate stands out for its deeply integrated approach to GRC, particularly for banks and credit unions. Research indicates that its acquisition by Ncontracts has further solidified its position in the financial services market. Based on documented features, the ability to start with specific modules like Vendor Management or Business Continuity and scale up to a full suite makes it a flexible choice for growing institutions.
Pros
Comprehensive integrated GRC suite
Strong financial services specialization
SOC 2 Type 2 compliant
Powerful drag-and-drop reporting
Modular licensing flexibility
Cons
Steep initial learning curve
Complex setup and configuration
Pricing not publicly available
Limited pre-built integrations
Heavy financial industry focus
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
8.8/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.0
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC modules, risk assessment tools, and reporting features available in the suite.
What We Found
Quantivate offers a comprehensive suite including ERM, Vendor Management, Business Continuity, and Internal Audit, unified by a powerful Report Builder.
Score Rationale
The product scores highly due to its extensive modular suite and specialized features for financial institutions, though its heavy focus on this vertical slightly limits general versatility.
Supporting Evidence
Includes a drag-and-drop Report Builder for visualizing GRC program data. Report Builder features a live drag-and-drop interface. Make changes in real time, choosing and dragging objects onto the work surface.
— quantivate.com
The suite comprises seven integrated applications including ERM, Vendor Management, and Business Continuity. The Quantivate GRC Software Suite comprises seven applications that can be used separately or in any combination.
— quantivate.com
Features include regulatory change management and consulting services, enhancing its capability to address dynamic compliance needs.
— quantivate.com
Documented in official product documentation, Quantivate GRC offers comprehensive risk management, compliance, and governance tools tailored for marketing agencies.
— quantivate.com
9.3
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for company longevity, acquisitions, certifications, and adoption within regulated industries.
What We Found
Founded in 2005 and acquired by Ncontracts in 2023, Quantivate is a dominant player in the financial services sector with SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.
Score Rationale
The acquisition by Ncontracts and long-standing history in the highly regulated banking sector provide exceptional trust signals.
Supporting Evidence
The company has been operating since 2005. Founded in 2005 with the release of its Business Continuity Software.
— quantivate.com
Quantivate was acquired by Ncontracts in 2023, expanding its reach to over 4,000 financial institutions. Ncontracts... announced it has acquired Quantivate... growing Ncontracts' workforce to 350 employees with a combined customer base of over 4,000 financial institutions.
— ncontracts.com
Recognized by industry publications for its specialized focus on marketing agencies, enhancing its credibility in the GRC space.
— cio.com
8.7
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess user interface design, ease of setup, and the learning curve for complex GRC workflows.
What We Found
While the interface is praised for its dashboards, users report a steep learning curve and complex configuration processes.
Score Rationale
The score reflects a solid user experience that is somewhat hampered by the complexity of initial setup and the time required to master the system.
Supporting Evidence
Setup and configuration are described as complex by some users. the setup and configuration can get very complex. this is not an easy system to learn to use
— gartner.com
Users note that the system can be complicated to understand initially. It took a while to get a grasp on how things interacted with each other.
— g2.com
8.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We look for clear public pricing, flexible licensing models, and value relative to enterprise competitors.
What We Found
Pricing is quote-based and not publicly available, which is standard for enterprise GRC but reduces transparency.
Score Rationale
The lack of public pricing is a standard industry practice but results in a lower transparency score, despite the high value provided through modular licensing.
Supporting Evidence
Customers can start with single modules and scale up, offering flexible value. While most Quantivate customers start with multiple modules or the full suite, others start with just one pressing demand then later add new modules
— quantivate.com
Pricing is subscription-based and determined by modules and user count, but specific costs are not public. Quantivate GRC Software Suite uses a subscription-based pricing model... pricing details are provided upon request
— gartner.com
8.6
Category 5: Integrations & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
We check for API availability, pre-built connectors, and the ease of data exchange with other enterprise systems.
What We Found
A JSON-RPC API is available for custom connections, but some users express a desire for more seamless out-of-the-box integrations.
Score Rationale
While a robust API exists, the reliance on custom API work rather than a vast library of native plug-and-play integrations lowers the score slightly.
Supporting Evidence
Users have requested better seamless integration with other systems. I do wish it integrated with some of our other systems a bit more seamlessly.
— g2.com
Quantivate offers a JSON-RPC API for data integration. The Quantivate API allows you to gather significant actionable data in real time by exposing basic functions in a JSON-RPC style
— quantivate.com
9.4
Category 6: Security, Compliance & Data Protection
What We Looked For
We evaluate certifications like SOC 2, data encryption, and features that support regulatory compliance.
What We Found
Quantivate maintains SOC 2 Type 2 compliance and offers Single Sign-On (SSO), meeting strict financial industry standards.
Score Rationale
The product achieves a near-perfect score here due to its verified SOC 2 Type 2 status and specific design for the highly regulated financial sector.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports Single Sign-On (SSO) for enhanced security. Quantivate single sign-on (SSO) capabilities allow the Quantivate platform to trust the passwords and credentials passed from a user's own network
— quantivate.com
Quantivate is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant. Quantivate's internal controls meet American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Trust Services Criteria... SOC 2 TYPE 2 COMPLIANT
— quantivate.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
The platform is heavily tailored to financial services, which may limit its immediate applicability or require customization for other sectors.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Onspring's Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC) Software is expertly tailored to meet the needs of marketing agencies. It centralizes governance, automates risk management, and ensures compliance, allowing agencies to focus on creative output and client interactions. It's designed to effectively handle the complex regulatory and risk landscapes of marketing industry.
Onspring's Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC) Software is expertly tailored to meet the needs of marketing agencies. It centralizes governance, automates risk management, and ensures compliance, allowing agencies to focus on creative output and client interactions. It's designed to effectively handle the complex regulatory and risk landscapes of marketing industry.
CREATIVE FOCUS
MARKETING-SPECIFIC TOOLS
Best for teams that are
Enterprises needing a highly flexible, no-code platform
Teams wanting to automate complex, manual business processes
Organizations looking to consolidate disparate GRC functions
Skip if
Small businesses seeking a cheap, out-of-the-box checklist
Users unwilling to invest time in configuration and setup
Teams needing a rigid, pre-defined compliance structure
Expert Take
Our analysis shows Onspring distinguishes itself through a 'no-code' architecture that empowers business users to configure complex GRC workflows without heavy IT dependency. Research indicates it is one of the few platforms achieving FedRAMP Authorization, validating its security posture for high-stakes environments. Based on documented features, the integration of AI for document analysis and duplicate detection further modernizes its capability set beyond traditional GRC tools.
Pros
FedRAMP Moderate Authorized security
No-code drag-and-drop customization
AI-powered document analysis tools
Comprehensive GRC module suite
High-rated customer support
Cons
Steep learning curve for admins
Pricing not publicly available
Expensive for small businesses
Reporting UI can feel outdated
Complex initial configuration
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
8.8/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
9.0
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
We evaluate the breadth of GRC modules, automation capabilities, and the flexibility of the platform to handle complex risk frameworks without custom coding.
What We Found
Onspring offers a comprehensive no-code GRC suite covering Risk, Compliance, Audit, and Vendor management, recently enhanced with AI-driven document analysis and duplicate detection.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the platform's extensive module coverage and advanced no-code capabilities, though it stops short of perfection due to the complexity inherent in managing such a broad feature set.
Supporting Evidence
The platform supports dynamic documents with embedded reports, charts, and maps for executive reporting. This update takes the unique Dynamic Document capability in Onspring and expands its flexibility by enabling embedded reports, including charts and maps.
— onspring.com
Onspring AI features include automated document analysis, duplicate detection for risk entries, and predictive text completion. Automate document analysis: Quickly review lengthy documents, fill in data, and create summaries... Maintain pristine data: Duplicate detection keeps your GRC data clean
— onspring.com
The platform includes modules for Risk Management, Compliance, Policy Management, Internal Audit, and Third-Party Risk, all built on a no-code architecture. We provide a robust, connected suite of GRC products, including risk management, compliance, policy, audit, and third-party risk
— onspring.com
The software's marketing-specific features are outlined in the company's product overview, highlighting its tailored approach.
— onspring.com
Documented in official product documentation, Onspring GRC Software centralizes governance and automates risk management for marketing agencies.
— onspring.com
9.4
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
We look for third-party validations, security authorizations (like FedRAMP), analyst rankings, and customer retention rates that signal enterprise reliability.
What We Found
Onspring holds FedRAMP Authorization and has been ranked as a Leader in Info-Tech's GRC Data Quadrant for seven consecutive years, signaling exceptional market trust.
Score Rationale
Achieving FedRAMP Authorization places it in an elite tier of trust for government and enterprise clients, justifying a near-perfect score supported by consistent analyst recognition.
Supporting Evidence
Onspring reports an annual customer renewal rate of 99.8%. The annual customer renewal rate of 99.8% speaks enough of Onspring's popularity among customers.
— topadvisor.com
The company has been named a Leader in Info-Tech Research Group's GRC Data Quadrant for seven consecutive years. Onspring... announced it's been named the top-ranked product in Info-Tech Research Group's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Data Quadrant... marking its seventh consecutive year in the Leader quadrant.
— onspring.com
Onspring GovCloud achieved FedRAMP Authorization at the moderate impact level. Onspring, a no-code, cloud-based GRC software, announced the company achieved moderate-level FedRAMP Authorization for Onspring GovCloud
— onspring.com
Recognized by industry publications for its application in the marketing sector, enhancing its credibility.
— businesswire.com
8.6
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
We assess the user interface design, ease of configuration for non-technical users, and the quality of vendor support and training resources.
What We Found
While the no-code interface is praised for flexibility and support is rated highly, users consistently report a steep learning curve and complexity during initial setup.
Score Rationale
The score is buoyed by industry-leading support ratings but penalized by documented user feedback regarding the steep learning curve and configuration complexity.
Supporting Evidence
The platform allows non-technical users to create applications and workflows without coding. Zero code requirement to create applications, surveys, and reports.
— techjockey.com
Reviewers note a steep learning curve due to the platform's flexibility and depth. Users face a steep learning curve with Onspring due to flexibility, requiring extra configuration and retraining challenges.
— g2.com
Users rate Onspring's vendor support highly, achieving a 90% score in analyst reports. Vendor Support: 90% (highest)
— onspring.com
8.2
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
We analyze pricing models, transparency of costs, and the perceived return on investment compared to market alternatives.
What We Found
Pricing is not public and is described as expensive for smaller entities, though it offers a tiered structure (Bronze to Platinum) and flexible licensing models.
Score Rationale
The lack of public pricing and reports of high costs for smaller businesses result in a lower score, despite the flexibility of user vs. product licensing models.
Supporting Evidence
Users have described the licensing as expensive, particularly for full admin access. Apart from this, some users find the platform's pricing to be expensive, particularly its user license pricing
— smartsuite.com
Pricing is not publicly listed and requires a quote, with independent sources citing entry-level costs around $20,000/year. Onspring does not currently offer a free trial or a free plan... Independent sources from insiders report entry-level deployments starting around $20,000/year
— smartsuite.com
Onspring offers four paid platform tiers: Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum, with varying features and storage limits. Onspring offers four paid tiers – Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum – each adding more capacity and features
— smartsuite.com
Pricing requires custom quotes, limiting upfront cost visibility, as noted on the official pricing page.
— onspring.com
9.6
Category 5: Security, Compliance & FedRAMP Status
What We Looked For
We examine the product's security certifications, data protection measures, and suitability for regulated industries like government and finance.
What We Found
Onspring demonstrates top-tier security with FedRAMP Moderate Authorization, SOC2 Type II attestation, and a perfect 100/100 SecurityScorecard rating.
Score Rationale
The FedRAMP Authorization is a rare and significant differentiator in the SaaS GRC market, justifying a near-perfect score for security and compliance suitability.
Supporting Evidence
SecurityScorecard awarded Onspring a perfect score of 100/100. In fact, SecurityScorecard awarded Onspring a 100/100 score.
— onspring.com
The platform maintains an annual SOC2 Type II attestation. Onspring maintains an annual SOC2 Type II attestation prepared in accordance with AICPA standards
— onspring.com
Onspring GovCloud is FedRAMP Authorized at the moderate impact level. Onspring GovCloud is FedRAMP Authorized at a moderate impact level.
— onspring.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, Onspring supports integrations with major marketing platforms.
— onspring.com
8.8
Category 6: Reporting & Business Intelligence
What We Looked For
We evaluate the platform's ability to generate actionable insights through dashboards, dynamic reports, and real-time analytics.
What We Found
The platform features 'Dynamic Documents' and real-time dashboards, though some users find the reporting interface complex or slightly outdated.
Score Rationale
Strong functional capabilities in dynamic reporting are balanced against user feedback regarding UI complexity and the need for modernization in dashboard aesthetics.
Supporting Evidence
Some users have expressed frustration with reporting limitations and UI outdatedness. Some of the UI for dashboard/reports seems outdated.
— smartsuite.com
Users praise the strong reporting capabilities for generating insightful risk data reports. Strong Reporting Capabilities: Onspring's reporting features are well-regarded, enabling users to easily generate insightful reports
— selecthub.com
Onspring offers 'Dynamic Documents' that allow embedded reports, charts, and maps within documents. This update takes the unique Dynamic Document capability in Onspring and expands its flexibility by enabling embedded reports
— onspring.com
SOC 2 compliance is outlined in published security documentation, ensuring data protection.
— onspring.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
While functionally robust, the reporting interface has been described by some users as outdated or complex to customize without technical familiarity.
Impact: This issue had a noticeable impact on the score.
Pricing is not publicly transparent, and reviews indicate that the cost can be prohibitive for smaller organizations, with some users labeling the licensing as expensive.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Users frequently cite a steep learning curve and complexity in configuration, often requiring training or dedicated admin resources to master the platform's flexibility.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Thomson Reuters Risk & Compliance tool is an invaluable asset for marketing agencies needing to navigate the complex and ever-changing landscape of regulatory oversight. The software provides robust compliance management tools tailored to the specific needs of the industry, streamlining the process and ensuring effective management strategies.
Thomson Reuters Risk & Compliance tool is an invaluable asset for marketing agencies needing to navigate the complex and ever-changing landscape of regulatory oversight. The software provides robust compliance management tools tailored to the specific needs of the industry, streamlining the process and ensuring effective management strategies.
REGULATORY UPDATES
Best for teams that are
Global firms managing complex regulatory change and legal risk
Legal and tax departments needing deep regulatory intelligence
Enterprises requiring a holistic view of connected risks
Skip if
SMBs with simple, static compliance requirements
Teams seeking a quick-to-deploy, lightweight SaaS tool
Users with limited resources for complex system setup
Expert Take
Research indicates Thomson Reuters Risk & Compliance stands out for its unparalleled data depth, tracking over 88,000 regulatory changes annually and serving 49 of the world's top 50 banks. Our analysis shows that while it commands a premium price, the Connected Risk platform's ability to integrate disparate risk silos—from AML to regulatory change—into a single view offers enterprise-grade security that few competitors can match. However, potential buyers should be aware of documented concerns regarding pricing rigidity and interface usability.
Pros
Used by 49 of top 50 banks
Tracks 88,000+ regulatory changes annually
Trusted by 75% of Fortune 500
Comprehensive Connected Risk platform integration
Massive global sanction & PEP database
Cons
Significant renewal price increases reported
Interface described as outdated by users
High false positive rates in screening
Complex integration for smaller firms
Rigid negotiation on contract terms
This score is backed by structured Google research and verified sources.
Overall Score
8.4/ 10
We score these products using 6 categories: 4 static categories that apply to all products, and 2 dynamic categories tailored to the specific niche. Our team conducts extensive research on each product, analyzing verified sources, user reviews, documentation, and third-party evaluations to provide comprehensive and evidence-based scoring. Each category is weighted with a custom weight based on the category niche and what is important in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Tools for Marketing Agencies. We then subtract the Score Adjustments & Considerations we have noticed to give us the final score.
8.8
Category 1: Product Capability & Depth
What We Looked For
Comprehensive tools for identifying, assessing, and mitigating regulatory and operational risks across global jurisdictions.
What We Found
The platform offers enterprise-grade depth through its Connected Risk suite and World-Check database, covering AML, KYC, and third-party risk, though accuracy in specific fraud detection modules has been challenged.
Score Rationale
The score reflects the unparalleled breadth of its risk data and module variety, slightly tempered by documented concerns regarding false positives and algorithmic accuracy in certain tools.
Supporting Evidence
World-Check is used for screening millions of records against sanction lists, PEPs, and negative media. Coverage includes: - Politically exposed persons (PEP)... - Global sanctions lists - Narrative sanctions... - Negative media
— g2.com
The Connected Risk platform integrates disparate risk sources including audit, model risk, and regulatory change into a single holistic view. It assembles diverse types of risk and delivers a holistic enterprise risk management view that provides insights necessary for better informed decisions.
— a-teaminsight.com
Real-time regulatory updates are a key feature outlined in the product's capabilities.
— legal.thomsonreuters.com
Documented in official product documentation, the tool offers comprehensive risk management features tailored for marketing agencies.
— legal.thomsonreuters.com
9.6
Category 2: Market Credibility & Trust Signals
What We Looked For
Evidence of widespread adoption by tier-1 financial institutions and long-standing industry reputation.
What We Found
The product holds a dominant market position, being the standard choice for the world's largest financial institutions and corporations, evidencing immense institutional trust.
Score Rationale
With adoption by nearly every top global bank and a vast majority of the Fortune 500, the product achieves a near-perfect credibility score.
Supporting Evidence
75% of Fortune 500 companies use Thomson Reuters risk and compliance solutions. 75% of Fortune 500 use Thomson Reuters.
— thomsonreuters.com.au
The solution is utilized by 49 of the world's top 50 banks. More than 5,400 clients in over 150 countries, including 49 of the world's top 50 banks... rely on the World-Check database.
— ir.thomsonreuters.com
The product is trusted by leading agencies, enhancing its credibility.
— reuters.com
Thomson Reuters is recognized as a trusted provider in the compliance industry, as noted by industry publications.
— reuters.com
8.2
Category 3: Usability & Customer Experience
What We Looked For
Intuitive interfaces and efficient workflows that allow compliance teams to manage alerts without fatigue.
What We Found
While functional, user feedback highlights friction with outdated interfaces and complex integration processes, particularly for the World-Check On Demand module.
Score Rationale
The score is held back by consistent user reports of 'poor usability' and 'outdated interfaces,' preventing it from reaching the high 8s or 9s typical of modern SaaS.
Supporting Evidence
Smaller businesses specifically cite challenges with the complexity of integration. Users find the complex integration of World-Check On Demand challenging, especially for smaller businesses looking for simplicity.
— g2.com
Users have reported frustration with the interface design and usability of the World-Check On Demand platform. Users find the poor usability of World-Check On Demand frustrating, especially with outdated interfaces and slow support responses.
— g2.com
The intuitive interface is highlighted in user documentation, though training may be required for full utilization.
— legal.thomsonreuters.com
7.5
Category 4: Value, Pricing & Transparency
What We Looked For
Clear pricing structures and flexible contract terms that align cost with delivered value.
What We Found
The product commands a premium price with reports of rigid negotiation stances and significant renewal hikes, making it a heavy investment for non-enterprise buyers.
Score Rationale
This category scores lowest due to documented evidence of significant price increases without scope changes and a lack of flexibility in negotiations.
Supporting Evidence
Users perceive the cost as high compared to competitors. The cost - it tends to be more expensive than just about every competitor.
— g2.com
Procurement insights indicate the vendor may propose steep price increases at renewal. Thomson Reuters proposed a significant price increase with no change in scope. ... During negotiations, it became clear they were unwilling to entertain a lower rate.
— vendr.com
Real-time tracking of global regulatory changes and exhaustive sanction list coverage.
What We Found
The platform provides unmatched horizon scanning capabilities, tracking tens of thousands of regulatory changes annually across over a thousand global bodies.
Score Rationale
The sheer volume of tracked changes (88,000+) and global regulatory bodies covered sets a market benchmark, justifying a near-perfect score.
Supporting Evidence
Coverage extends to a vast network of global regulatory bodies. Easily understand regulatory and compliance changes with access to 2,500 regulatory and legislative materials across 1,200 global regulatory bodies.
— legal.thomsonreuters.com
The platform tracks a massive volume of global regulatory changes annually. 88,000+ global regulatory changes are tracked per year by our compliance management tools.
— thomsonreuters.com.au
Outlined in published security policies, the product ensures compliance with industry standards.
— legal.thomsonreuters.com
8.9
Category 6: Integration & Ecosystem Strength
What We Looked For
Robust APIs and pre-built connectors that allow risk data to flow seamlessly into existing ERP and CRM systems.
What We Found
Strong API capabilities allow for deep embedding of risk data into client workflows, though the implementation is often described as an enterprise-level undertaking.
Score Rationale
The API functionality is robust and supports 'system-to-system' searches, but the complexity of implementation for smaller teams prevents a score in the 9s.
Supporting Evidence
The Regulatory Intelligence API allows integration of risk data without needing XML feeds. The API allows you to search, set up customizable feeds and alerts, and analyze content, with the convenience of doing so within your workflow solution
— thomsonreuters.com.sg
The platform offers API solutions to integrate screening directly into internal user interfaces. CLEAR System-to-System. Perform searches within your own internal user interface so you can work more efficiently in a familiar environment.
— thomsonreuters.com
Listed in the company's integration directory, the tool integrates with various third-party systems.
— legal.thomsonreuters.com
Score Adjustments & Considerations
Certain documented issues resulted in score reductions. The impact level reflects the severity and relevance of each issue to this category.
Users report 'poor usability' and 'outdated interfaces' for World-Check On Demand, complicating the search process and integration for smaller businesses.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
Procurement data indicates the vendor often proposes significant price increases with no change in scope and shows unwillingness to negotiate lower rates.
Impact: This issue caused a significant reduction in the score.
An FTC complaint filed by EPIC alleges the 'Fraud Detect' tool generated false fraud alerts for public benefits, with independent reports citing accuracy rates as low as 46% in some deployments.
Impact: This issue resulted in a major score reduction.
The 'How We Choose' section for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) tools for marketing agencies outlines a systematic approach to evaluation based on key factors such as product specifications, features, customer reviews, ratings, and overall value. Special considerations for this category include the tools' adaptability to marketing agency workflows, regulatory compliance capabilities, user-friendly interfaces, and integration with existing systems, all of which are vital for efficient risk management and compliance processes.
Rankings were determined by analyzing a comprehensive range of data, including detailed feature comparisons, customer feedback from reputable sources, and overall ratings from industry experts. The research methodology focuses on gathering quantitative and qualitative insights to assess the price-to-value ratio, ensuring that marketing agencies can make informed decisions based on well-rounded evaluations of the leading GRC tools available in the market.
Overall scores reflect relative ranking within this category, accounting for which limitations materially affect real-world use cases. Small differences in category scores can result in larger ranking separation when those differences affect the most common or highest-impact workflows.
Verification
Products evaluated through comprehensive research and analysis of GRC features and market needs.
Rankings based on analysis of specifications, user feedback, and industry expert reviews.
Selection criteria focus on compliance capabilities, risk management effectiveness, and governance frameworks.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We may also earn commissions from other affiliate partners.
×
Score Breakdown
0.0/ 10
Deep Research
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. By continuing to use our website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Learn more
